Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 184, 2024 Feb 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38347513

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chronic comorbid conditions are common in patients with sepsis and may affect the outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and outcomes of common comorbidities in patients with sepsis. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study. Using data from the National Health Insurance Service of Korea. Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) who were hospitalized in tertiary or general hospitals with a diagnosis of sepsis between 2011 and 2016 were analyzed. After screening of all International Classification of Diseases 10th revision codes for comorbidities, we identified hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), liver cirrhosis (LC), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and malignancy as prevalent comorbidities. RESULTS: Overall, 373,539 patients diagnosed with sepsis were hospitalized in Korea between 2011 and 2016. Among them, 46.7% had hypertension, 23.6% had DM, 7.4% had LC, 13.7% had CKD, and 30.7% had malignancy. In-hospital mortality rates for patients with hypertension, DM, LC, CKD, and malignancy were 25.5%, 25.2%, 34.5%, 28.0%, and 33.3%, respectively, showing a decreasing trend over time (P < 0.001). After adjusting for baseline characteristics, male sex, older age, use of mechanical ventilation, and continuous renal replacement therapy, LC, CKD, and malignancy were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Hypertension is the most prevalent comorbidity in patients with sepsis, and it is associated with an increased survival rate. Additionally, liver cirrhosis, chronic kidney disease, and malignancy result in higher mortality rates than hypertension and DM, and are significant risk factors for in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Hypertension , Neoplasms , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Sepsis , Adult , Humans , Male , Adolescent , Cohort Studies , Retrospective Studies , Prevalence , Comorbidity , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Hypertension/epidemiology , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/epidemiology , Neoplasms/complications , Sepsis/etiology , Republic of Korea/epidemiology
2.
Korean J Anesthesiol ; 77(1): 95-105, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37232074

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: General anesthetic techniques can affect postoperative recovery. We compared the effect of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and desflurane anesthesia on postoperative recovery. METHODS: In this randomized trial, 150 patients undergoing robot-assisted or laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cancer were randomly allocated to either the TIVA or desflurane anesthesia (DES) group. Postoperative recovery was evaluated using the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire (QoR-15K) at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h postoperatively. A generalized estimating equation (GEE) was performed to analyze longitudinal QoR-15K data. Fentanyl consumption, pain severity, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and quality of life three weeks after discharge were also compared. RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 70 patients in each group. The TIVA group showed significantly higher QoR-15K scores at 24 and 48 h postoperatively (24 h: DES, 96 [77, 109] vs. TIVA, 104 [82, 117], median difference 8 [95% CI: 1, 15], P = 0.029; 48 h: 110 [95, 128] vs. 125 [109, 130], median difference 8 [95% CI: 1, 15], P = 0.022), however not at 72 h (P = 0.400). The GEE revealed significant effects of group (adjusted mean difference 6.2, 95% CI: 0.39, 12.1, P = 0.037) and time (P < 0.001) on postoperative QoR-15K scores without group-time interaction (P = 0.051). However, there were no significant differences in other outcomes, except for fentanyl consumption, within the first 24 h postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol-based TIVA showed only a transient improvement in postoperative recovery than desflurane anesthesia, without significant differences in other outcomes.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , Propofol , Humans , Anesthetics, Intravenous , Desflurane , Quality of Life , Anesthesia Recovery Period , Fentanyl , Anesthetics, Inhalation/adverse effects , Anesthesia, General/methods , Nephrectomy/adverse effects
3.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 23(1): 334, 2023 10 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37798642

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: High quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is one of the key elements of the survival chain in cardiac arrest. Audiovisual feedback of chest compressions have been suggested to be beneficial by increasing the quality of CPR in the simulated cardiac arrests. METHODS: A prospective before and after study was performed to investigate the effect of a real-time audiovisual feedback system on CPR quality during in-hospital cardiac arrest in intensive care units from November 2018 to February 2022. In the feedback period, CPR was performed with the aid of the real-time audiovisual feedback system. The primary outcome was the percentage of compressions with both adequate depth (5.0-6.0 cm) and rate (100-120/minute). RESULTS: A total of 27,295 compressions in 30 cardiac arrests in the no-feedback period and 27,965 compressions in 30 arrests in the feedback period were analyzed. The percentage of compressions with both adequate depth and rate was 11.8% in the feedback period and 16.8% in the no-feedback period (P < 0.01). The percentage of compressions with adequate rate in the feedback period was lower than that in the no-feedback period (67.3% vs. 75.5%, P < 0.01). The percentage of beyond-target depth with the feedback was significantly higher than that without feedback (64.2% vs. 51.4%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Real-time audiovisual feedback system did not increase CPR quality and was associated with a higher percentage of compression depth deeper than the recommended 5.0-6.0 cm. It is essential to explore more effective ways of implementing feedback in real clinical settings to improve of the quality of CPR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03902873 (study start: Nov. 2018, initial release April 2019, retrospectively registered).


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Heart Arrest , Humans , Defibrillators , Feedback , Heart Arrest/therapy , Manikins , Prospective Studies , Controlled Before-After Studies
4.
J Clin Anesth ; 87: 111107, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36924749

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The effect of perioperative body temperature derangement on postoperative delirium remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the association between intraoperative body temperature and postoperative delirium in patients having noncardiac surgery. DESIGN: Single-center retrospective observational study. SETTING: Tertiary university hospital. PATIENT: Adult patients who had major noncardiac surgery under general anesthesia for at least two hours between 2019 and 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were classified into three groups according to their intraoperative time-weighted average body temperature: severe hypothermia (<35.0 °C), mild hypothermia (35.0 °C-36.0 °C), and normothermia (≥36.0 °C) groups. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the risk of delirium occurring within seven days after surgery, which was compared using logistic regression analysis. A multivariable procedure was performed adjusting for potential confounders including demographics, history of hypertension, diabetes, atrial fibrillation or flutter, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and stroke or transient ischemic attack, preoperative use of antidepressants and statins, preoperative sodium imbalance, high-risk surgery, emergency surgery, duration of surgery, and red blood cell transfusion. Cox regression analysis was also performed using the same covariates. MAIN RESULTS: Among 27,674 patients analyzed, 5.5% experienced postoperative delirium. The incidence rates of delirium were 6.2% (63/388) in the severe hypothermia group, 6.4% (756/11779) in the mild hypothermia group, and 4.6% (712/15507) in the normothermia group. Compared with the normothermia group, the risk of delirium was significantly higher in the severe hypothermia (adjusted odds ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.97) and mild hypothermia (1.15; 1.02-1.28) groups. The mild hypothermia group also had a significantly increased risk of cumulative development of delirium than the normothermia group (adjusted hazard ratio 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.26). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative hypothermia (even mild hypothermia) was significantly associated with an increased risk of postoperative delirium.


Subject(s)
Emergence Delirium , Hypothermia , Adult , Humans , Body Temperature , Hypothermia/etiology , Hypothermia/complications , Retrospective Studies , Regression Analysis , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology
5.
Pain Med ; 24(1): 79-88, 2023 01 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35881702

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the opioid consumption and the healthcare resource utilization in patients with the intrathecal drug delivery system (IDDS) therapy and the comprehensive medical management (CMM) alone. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study with a customized claims database. SETTING: In a university-based hospital. SUBJECTS: Patients with complex regional pain syndrome, post-laminectomy syndrome, and fibromyalgia. METHODS: Using propensity score matching (1:3), we selected patients with morphine infusion through IDDS (IDDS group) and CMM alone (CMM group). The primary endpoints were comparisons of average morphine equivalents daily dosages (MEDD, mg/day) for 6 and 12 months from an index date. The number of emergency room (ER) visits and hospitalizations and the total medical expenditures were compared as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 82 patients (N = 23 in the IDDS group and N = 59 in the CMM group) were analyzed. Although a 6-month average MEDD did not reach statistical significance, a 12-month average MEDD was significantly decreased in the IDDS group compared to the CMM group (53.2 ± 46.3 vs 123.9 ± 176.4, respectively; P = 0.008). ER visits were more frequent in the IDDS group than the CMM group at baseline (5.4 vs 0.5, respectively; P = .002), which was maintained for 12 months (P < 0.001). Otherwise, the number of hospitalization and the medical expenditures for pain management were not different between the groups for 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The combined IDDS therapy had some benefits in reducing opioid consumption for 1-year follow-up compared to the CMM alone in chronic noncancer pain patients.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Chronic Pain , Humans , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Morphine , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Chronic Pain/chemically induced , Retrospective Studies , Infusion Pumps, Implantable , Injections, Spinal
6.
Transplantation ; 106(6): 1201-1205, 2022 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34560697

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Living liver donation is generally considered safe, but donors may experience short- or long-term complications. The purpose of this study was to assess healthcare resource utilization after liver donation in living liver donors in comparison with the general population. METHODS: Outpatient or emergency department visits and hospital admissions were compared between living liver donors who underwent hepatic resection for living liver donation between 2004 and 2018 and the matched general population. Healthcare resource utilization data for 5 y after liver donation were collected from the National Health Insurance Service database. For every living liver donor, 4 individually matched nondonors were selected from the National Health Insurance Service database using age, sex, preexisting comorbidities, and previous healthcare utilization history. RESULTS: A total of 1886 living liver donors and 7309 nondonors were included. In the first year after donation, living liver donors required more outpatient department visits (7 [4-13] versus 3 [1-7], P < 0.001) and more emergency department visits (13.33% versus 0.15%, P < 0.001) compared with matched nondonors. A similar trend persisted for 5 y after donation. The number of hospital admissions of living liver donors was higher for up to 2 y after donation with longer hospital length of stay (13.0 [10.5-16.0] d versus 5.0 [3.0-9.0] d, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare resource utilization in living liver donors for 5 y after donation was higher compared with matched nondonors. The higher healthcare resource demand may be related to postoperative complications or lowered threshold for healthcare resource utilization after donation.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Nephrectomy , Case-Control Studies , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , Liver , Living Donors , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...